Google+ Followers

Friday, 14 November 2014

Actions speak louder than words - The AIM Network

Actions speak louder than words - The AIM Network

Actions speak louder than words

Joe Hockey has been making noise about tax avoidance.

“They’re stealing from us and our community,” he told the Nine Network on Friday, labelling tax cheats as “thieves.”

Tony Abbott told us we should judge the Coalition on their actions
rather than their words – sound advice considering their words bear no
resemblance to what they actually do – so it would be timely to consider
what they have done to address this growing problem.

While other countries are closing their tax minimisation loopholes,
the Abbott government has spent the past year opening them up.

One of Treasurer Joe Hockey’s first acts in office was to roll back Labor’s measures to tackle profit shifting and improving tax transparency – effectively handing back $1.1 billion to big global firms.

As it pushes for a G20 summit agreement this weekend to crack down on corporate tax evasion,
the Abbott government has set a timetable for action that is about one
year behind the biggest European economies including Britain, France and

The “early adopters” in the global program will begin exchanging
information in September 2017, however, the exchange of information with
Australian authorities will not take place until September 2018.

In March this year, the ATO announced an amnesty for offshore tax cheats
For those who come forward before the end of the calendar year, there
is a guarantee of no prosecution and only four years of offshore income
is assessed with a maximum shortfall penalty of 10 per cent.

“For lots of people, their forebearers came from war-torn Europe”,
tax lawyer Mark Leibler told the ABC’s AM program.  “They wanted to keep
nest eggs overseas, not primarily in order to avoid or evade tax, but
just as a measure of security.”

So these people and their families have been avoiding tax since they arrived here after the war but let’s not worry about that.

Around $150 million worth of assets is the most declared by one
person so far. The money has come from 40 countries including
Switzerland, the UK, Hong Kong, Israel and Singapore.

Australian Tax Office deputy commissioner, Greg Williams, said new
migrants with limited knowledge of Australia’s tax system and people
that have deliberately sent money offshore are also among those coming

“You’ve got that whole gamut from old money, new money, recent migrants and people sending the money offshore,” he said.

These ‘people’ include our own government.

Australia’s Future Fund
has revealed it has invested more than $20 billion through offshore tax
shelters, including the Cayman Islands, warning of lower returns if it
does not minimise its tax bill.

The $77bn fund for federal public-servant pensions has revealed that
14.4 per cent of its assets, worth about $11bn, are invested in
subsidiaries based in the Cayman Islands (a tax haven in the Caribbean)
and a further 1.3 per cent is in its subsidiaries in the British Virgin
Islands and Jersey.

On top of this, the fund has tipped 12.6 per cent of assets, about
$9.6bn, into private market vehicles based in these tax shelters and a
small fraction is invested in a vehicle based in Luxembourg.

Answers to a Senate inquiry revealed that, at June 30, the fund held
stakes in 15 tobacco manufacturers including a $55.4 million stake in
British American Tobacco in Britain, $44.5m in Lorillard and a $44.9m
investment in Philip Morris in the US.

Individuals within the government also embrace the benefits of tax “minimisation”.

In July, it was disclosed that Malcolm Turnbull, Australia’s second-richest parliamentarian, has invested in a ”vulture fund” based in the tax haven Cayman Islands.

Mr Turnbull, who has divested himself of shares and switched his
investments to managed funds and hedge funds since being elected,
updated the register of members’ interests on June 18.

The IPA, not surprisingly, is against any moves to tighten up the laws.

“Inspired by the sensationalist headlines, the emerging policy agenda
for a clamp down on tax avoidance should be seen for what it truly is: a
ploy by indebted countries, with overgrown public sectors, to hoover up
more cash from productive people and enterprises, stifling tax
competition in the process.”

You have to give them credit for never letting morality or ethics
interfere.  They were no doubt impressed when their much-loved patron,
Rupert Murdoch, single-handedly blew an almost billion dollar hole in
our budget when the ATO chose not to appeal a court ruling condoning
Murdoch’s tax avoidance practices.

In a 1989 meeting, four News Corp Australia executives exchanged
cheques and share transfers between local and overseas subsidiaries that
moved through several currencies.

They were paper transactions; no funds actually moved. In 2000 and
2001 the loans were unwound. With the Australian dollar riding high,
News Corp’s Australian subsidiaries recorded a $2 billion loss, while
other subsidiaries in tax havens recorded a $2 billion gain.

By last July that paper “loss”, booked against News Corp’s Australian newspaper operations, had become an $882 million cash payout.

Under a legal arrangement when the company was spun off last June,
News was forced to pass all of the tax payout to Mr Murdoch’s 21st
Century Fox.

News Corp said it had retained $A81 million because it faced income
tax charges on the interest payments by the Tax Office. However it seems
unlikely to actually pay these funds: News Corp Australia carried
another $1.5 billion in tax deductions from a separate paper shuffle
that it made when News reincorporated in the US.

The Australian Taxation Office says its $882 million loss to Rupert
Murdoch’s News Corporation may just be the tip of the iceberg.

Tax Commissioner Chris Jordan and deputy Neil Olesen told a parliamentary inquiry the Tax Office has recently lost even more valuable cases against individual taxpayers.

“There are others bigger than this one,” Mr Olesen told a
parliamentary hearing in March. “There were significant amounts at stake
that we were also unsuccessful with through the courts.”

In a current case, Australian tax authorities allege multinational oil giant Chevron
used a series of loans and related party payments worth billions of
dollars to slash its tax bill by up to $258 million. The claim is now
being heard before the Federal Court of NSW.

Despite growing pressure to crack down on multinationals reaping
massive profits in Australia each year and paying little tax, the ATO
has been scaling back its technical ability to force the
“transnationals” to pay up.

After cuts of $189 million in the May budget, the ATO announced that they had to cut staff by 2,100 people by the end of October.

Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) deputy national president
Alistair Waters said “The tax office has provided evidence to the Senate
that for every $1 spent on resources by the tax office, that collects $6 in tax revenue
Obviously if you are pulling resources out of the tax office that makes
it easier for people who might want to avoid paying their tax.”

Public servants with hundreds of years of combined technical know-how
have left the ATO’s “Internationals’ Group” in recent years, with the
process accelerated by the present massive cuts to the agency.

Private advisors
hired by “transnationals” to minimise their tax payments know too much
about internal workings of the ATO and are using their insider knowledge
to profit their clients.

Case deadlines of 90 days imposed on audit teams by ATO bosses eager
to increase the number of cases covered have allowed transnationals to
simply “wait out” the Taxation Office or to have low-ball settlements

Swedish furniture giant IKEA paid just $7.7 million in tax in
Australia in 2013-2014, despite banking an operating profit of $92
million for its Australian activities that year.

Even the government’s domestic decisions belie their stated willingness to crack down on tax rorting.

Repealing the legislation regarding novated car leases
and FBT cost us $1.8 billion in revenue and the only people to benefit
are those who fraudulently claim business usage of their car, and the
salary-packaging industry that has sprung up to service this perk.

But what can you expect from a Prime Minister
who keeps caucus waiting for an hour – his excuse being “he had to
schedule an early morning visit to a cancer research centre in Melbourne
on Tuesday so that he could justify billing taxpayers to be in the city
for a “private function” the night before”.

Or a Treasurer
who defended “his practice of claiming a $270-a-night taxpayer-funded
travelling allowance to stay in a Canberra house majority-owned by his
wife” as did the Communications Minister who “rented a house from his
wife Lucy when in Canberra.”

In Canberra, MPs are not required to show a receipt to prove they
stayed in a hotel because the blanket $270 rate applies whether you stay
in a hotel or a house owned by yourself or another person.

Because of the rules, many MPs purchase property in Canberra to
provide a base during parliamentary sittings and use their travel
allowance to pay off their mortgage.

We also have our Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Foreign Minister
and Agriculture Minister defending their practice to claim travel and
accommodation costs to attend weddings
whilst grudgingly refunding the money only after it was exposed in the
press.  Attendance at sporting events apparently still constitutes
official business.

Tony Abbott had promised to lead an honest government that would respect taxpayers’ money and end the age of entitlement.

Joe Hockey has “vowed to give the Tax Office whatever laws it needs”
and is “determined to use all available resources to close tax

Sorry boys – your actions make me doubt your sincerity.

Like this:

No comments:

Post a Comment